False Narrative. When a woman has her appendix removed or a tumor excised, no one cries murder. So it was easy to create the false narrative that the “fetus” was a glob of tissue (much like a tumor or appendix) that any doctor would remove.
The argument that a baby not born yet Is supposed to be nothing more than a glob of tissue was never proven in court. It was supposed. Those who argued the case filibustered hoping no one would notice. No one did.
What wasn’t revealed at the 1973 hearing was the heartbeat and sonogram. With one trip to the library, anyone could have learned that 78 years before Roe v Wade, the heartbeat of baby in the womb was detected; and just 31 years before Roe, the sonogram, which shows an image of the baby in utero was seen.
There’s no evidence that either of these material facts were brought up during the 1973 case.
It seems logical to deduce that evidence of baby’s heartbeat was concealed, because it would refute the “Glob of tissue” narrative, and that was a needed deception in court --and later to the American people.
Be realistic. If a anybody can learn these facts, these LIARS had to have known, or should have known, likely before they laid the groundwork for this “woman’s rights” falsehood. Make sense?
When the matter before a court involves human life, there’s a trial and the “person” subject to the death penalty has the right to a defense. It’s called due process.
Ending a baby’s LIFE without presenting material facts or allowing due process was an obscene slight of hand in the 1973 court that day.
The death penalty of abortion was applied nationwide to every act of intercourse whether or not it was known IF conception, pregnancy and birth was imminent.
In other words, when deciding to end the LIFE of a “baby waiting to be born” —the penalty was the same without distinction.
Baby was sentenced to death as if LIFE was 100% disposable.
The American people witnessed our brightest Justices in 1973 conclude that LIFE was “selectable” and disposable. Would the ruling have been different if all relative facts would have been presented?
